Got a hit! It is actually a pretty good one too!
One rival billionaire, who asked not to be identified because he did not like to discuss publicly the charity efforts of his peers, wondered why Mr. Bloomberg was not making larger contributions. “You want to meet your unique capabilities,” this person said. “Giving away $2 billion in one shot — now that would meet Mike’s capabilities.”
Which is especially horseshit because the horseshit justification for anonymity is proven to be horseshit in the very next sentence.
that was SUCH a good article (in a lmao way)
Does anyone out there think Barack Obama is too thin to be president? Anyone having a hard time relating to him and his “no excess body fat”?
im actually dead
Turns out the user onlinebeerbellygirl was created the same day Amy Chozick created the article. onlinebeerbellygirl only posted in that thread and has since never logged in. A google search of onlinebeerbellygirl only turns up that thread. Is it possible Amy Chozick is onlinebeerbellygirl as well? (link)
hot fucking damn trotter
Anonymous sources in the Times allow powerful people to speak with the weight of the paper of record but without any personal consequences. Yahoo! Answers is the best website on the internet. No contest.
thank you for weighing in, max. anyone else?